Who's Deciding Your Child's Future? Probably Someone No One Tested.
- PAPA
- Sep 23
- 6 min read
When we board a flight, we place our trust in the pilot, assured by their extensive training and psychological evaluations that ensure our safety.

Airline pilots face rigorous psychological and psychiatric assessments to confirm their capability to manage stress, make critical decisions under pressure, and maintain emotional stability in life-or-death scenarios.
These evaluations are thorough and continuous, always prioritising passenger safety.
By contrast, consider the role of a family court judge.
This individual is given the immense responsibility of making decisions that can shape a child's life forever—custody arrangements, visitation disputes, and the overall environment in which a child lives.
The weight of these decisions is nearly as heavy as the responsibilities held by a pilot navigating through the skies.
However, unlike pilots, judges in most jurisdictions do not undergo mandatory psychological testing before taking the bench.
Their emotional stability, personality traits, and potential biases are rarely assessed.
While legal knowledge and experience are scrutinised, judges' mental resilience or ability to make sound decisions under stress often goes unchecked.
This article looks at how psychological testing compares across professions and why psychological testing is important.
If you're an alienated parent or grandparent and need help with your situation then you should join PAPA today.
At PAPA we have several free to use support spaces, as well as additional resources available to our Plus members, such as courses, PAPA AI, support sessions and 1-2-1 help.
The Stark Contrast
The contrast between these two professions is remarkable:
Airline pilots: Required psychological screening, regular evaluations, and high accountability.
Judges: No required psychological testing, decisions directly impact vulnerable children, and minimal accountability for potential emotional instability.
This gap is not just theoretical.
Cases of judicial bias, emotional outbursts, or poor decision-making can directly harm families.
For instance, imagine a judge influenced by unresolved personal trauma or stress during a custody hearing.
The resulting decisions can drastically affect a child's future, potentially leading to unstable living conditions.
It's not just airline pilots that receive greater testing but actually many other professions that some could argue are less influential than judges.
Judges wield significant power over the lives of children and families, yet their psychological fitness for this role is seldom assessed.
This lack of scrutiny raises serious concerns about the integrity of the judicial process and the well-being of those most vulnerable.
The Implications of Judicial Decisions on our Child's Future
The impact of judicial decisions on children is profound.
A judge's ruling on custody often dictates where a child will live, who they spend time with, and the overall stability of their upbringing.
If judges are not held to the same psychological standards as pilots, the risks of harmful outcomes become all too real.
Take, for example, a judge going through personal difficulties, like a divorce or the loss of a loved one.
Their emotional state could seriously cloud their judgment, resulting in custody decisions that do not prioritise a child's best interests.
In one alarming case, a judge's bias stemming from personal history led to a child being placed in an unhealthy home environment, with devastating results for that child's emotional well-being.
The stakes could not be higher, and the need for psychological evaluations becomes increasingly pressing.
If we confidently trust pilots with our lives, should we not extend that same level of scrutiny to judges who make choices affecting children's futures?
Comparisons with Other Professions
Interestingly, other professions involving public safety and child welfare often undergo more psychological evaluation than judges.
Police officers, probation officers, and teachers typically face assessments to ensure their fitness for duty.
These evaluations are in place to confirm that individuals in these pivotal roles can manage stressful situations and make sound decisions.
In stark contrast, judges can serve for decades without any formal assessment of their mental health.

This discrepancy prompts essential questions about the accountability we demand from those in power.
If we expect emotional stability and sound judgment from pilots, police officers, and educators, why should judges remain exempt from evaluation?
The Consequences of Inaction
Failing to implement psychological testing for judges can lead to severe consequences.
Judicial bias, emotional volatility, and impulsive decision-making can create outcomes that fall far short of serving a child's best interests.
Families can be torn apart, and children's lives can be forever altered because a judge struggles with their emotions or personal challenges.
Moreover, the absence of accountability can engender an environment where judges act without ramifications.
This could create a culture where poor decisions are unchallenged, further endangering vulnerable children and families.
The Case for Psychological Testing
Implementing psychological testing for family court judges is about more than accountability; it is critical to protecting our most vulnerable citizens—children.
By ensuring judges are psychologically fit for their roles, we can reduce the risks associated with emotional instability and bias.
Psychological evaluations can offer vital insights into a judge's ability to handle pressure and make thoughtful decisions.
These assessments can identify potential issues before they affect judicial outcomes, leading to more beneficial results for children and families.
For example, an evaluation might highlight a judge's difficulty in managing stress, allowing them to receive support before it can impact their decisions in court.
Additionally, regular psychological assessments can foster a culture of accountability within the judiciary.
Judges aware that their emotional and psychological fitness will be evaluated may be more inclined to seek help for personal issues, ultimately improving their decision-making abilities.
A Call to Action
The need for psychological testing among family court judges is evident.
As a society, we must advocate for reforms that prioritise the well-being of children and families.
This includes pushing for mandatory psychological evaluations for judges, similar to those required for airline pilots and other high-stakes professions.
By raising awareness around this issue, we can inspire policymakers and legal institutions to take action.
It is essential to foster a judicial system that values not only legal knowledge and experience but also the emotional and psychological fitness of those who make critical decisions that shape lives.
Moving Forward
The disparity between the rigorous psychological evaluations required for airline pilots and the absence of similar assessments for family court judges is troubling.
The choices made by judges can significantly impact children and families, yet their emotional stability and decision-making skills are rarely scrutinised.
As we continue to entrust pilots with our safety, we must also demand that judges meet similar standards.
Implementing psychological testing for family court judges is a vital step towards ensuring that vulnerable children are protected and that judicial decisions are made with the utmost care.
By advocating for these necessary changes, we can help create a judicial system that genuinely prioritises the well-being of children and families, paving the way for better outcomes for all involved.
The time for action is now; the stakes are too high to ignore.
In need of help or support?
If you are an alienated parent reading this article and feel you are in need of help and support then please make sure to join PAPA today by signing up here on our website.
This will give you access to our community support forum as well as our Resource Centre, which includes downloadable guides and on-demand courses to help through the process of being alienated and regaining contact with your children.
We also have our Facebook support group that you can join here.
Our Facebook support group has several dedicated chat rooms where you can get immediate support.
If you are a member of PAPA you can also send us a message here on the website and we will try to get back to you as soon as possible but please bear in mind, we have hundreds of messages weekly so it may take us a while to get back to you.
We are currently prioritising PAPA Plus members due to high demand.
Regardless of circumstance you are not alone and at PAPA we are here to support you.
Become a PAPA Ambassador
If you like our resources, articles and support networks and agree with what we stand for then why not get involved and help us push PAPA further by joining our Ambassador Program?
We would love for you to join us and help spread awareness for parental alienation and all of the dynamics involved so that we can continue to help parents and children towards a better future.
Our Ambassador Program allows you to grow your involvement with the cause by earning points on your membership.
To earn points we have created rewards for actions such as completing one of our courses, booking a case review, or ordering supply.
We will be adding new rewards and actions to our Ambassador Program as we continue to grow our awareness efforts.
We want our members to feel rewarded for their support as we continue to look for new ways to improve the lives of those impacted by parental alienation.
You can also become a PAPA Plus member, which will give you exclusive access to even more help and resources.
Each PAPA Plus membership makes a huge difference to the cause as it really helps us to improve our services and our awareness campaigns.
Proceeds from memberships and supply allow us to push the cause much further towards raising awareness and improving our services and resources so that we can continue to help more and more parents and children.
Thank you for reading and for your continued support of PAPA and our mission to end parental alienation.
Comments