Are Family Court Judges Really THAT Bad?
- PAPA
- Sep 15
- 6 min read
Family courts are often perceived as intense arenas where emotions run high, and the stakes involve personal relationships.

The judges who oversee these cases are faced with the weighty task of making decisions that can significantly impact families, especially children.
Yet, the question arises: do family court judges always make the best choices?
This article aims to provide a thoughtful exploration of family court judges, the role of external agencies like CAFCASS, and the various factors contributing to potential judgement errors.
We will also suggest some actionable ideas to improve decision-making in family courts.
If you are a parent currently going through family court, it is important that you join PAPA Plus and make use of our courses and other resources, including PAPA AI.
If you require direct assistance with your case, you can also book a call or support session with PAPA as a 'Plus' member.
The Role of Family Court Judges
Family court judges oversee cases related to divorce, child custody, child support, and domestic violence, among other matters.
Their primary objective is to uphold the child's best interests while also considering the rights of the parents involved.
Judges typically come from backgrounds in family law and are trained to navigate sensitive issues.
They are expected to be impartial and base their decisions on the evidence presented.
However, the emotional complexity of family dynamics can lead to cloudy judgement.
For example, a custody decision could determine which parent the child lives with and the overall direction of their upbringing.
Given how profound these rulings can be, it’s vital to understand the factors that may influence judges and the potential for errors in their rulings.
The Influence of Outside Agencies
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) plays a significant role in family court cases.
This agency focuses on the best interests of children in court proceedings by conducting assessments, gathering information, and making recommendations based on its findings.
While CAFCASS is vital in ensuring children's interests are represented, their involvement can also complicate matters.
For instance, if a CAFCASS officer issues a flawed or biased assessment, the judge may rely heavily on this information, which could lead to misguided rulings.
In fact, a study showed that 30% of CAFCASS reports contained inaccuracies that could influence judicial decisions.
Moreover, as human beings, CAFCASS officers can make mistakes.
They might misinterpret a parent’s behaviour, disregard essential evidence, or fail to fully consider the child's viewpoint.
When such errors occur, they can result in rulings that do not serve children's best interests, raising valid concerns about the overall efficiency of the family court system.
Common Reasons for Errors in Judgement
Understanding the common reasons behind errors in judgement can help address issues within the family court system.
1. Emotional Bias
Family court cases are often fraught with emotions.
Judges, too, can be swayed by emotional bias.
For example, they may unknowingly favour one parent based on their demeanour or past experiences.
According to a survey, around 40% of family law practitioners reported seeing instances where emotional bias influenced judicial rulings.
2. Incomplete Information
Judges depend on the information presented during hearings.
If a party omits critical evidence, or if a CAFCASS report is lacking, the judge’s ruling may be based on insufficient information.
This can result in decisions that do not adequately reflect the reality of the situation, potentially affecting children's lives negatively.
3. Overreliance on Expert Opinions
Judges frequently consult experts, such as psychologists or social workers, to guide their decisions.
While these experts can offer valuable insights, their assessments may not cover all angles.
If a judge relies too heavily on one expert’s opinion, it can skew the overall decision-making process.
4. Time Constraints
Family court judges often bear a heavy caseload, which can lead to tremendous time pressures.
With limited time to review cases, judges may rush decisions, overlooking important details.
Data suggests that judges may spend as little as 30 minutes on some custody cases, which can lead to superficial assessments.
5. Lack of Training in Family Dynamics
Despite their legal training, many judges lack specialised knowledge in family dynamics or child psychology.
This gap can hinder their ability to make well-informed decisions that genuinely reflect what is best for children.
Ideas to Help Minimise Wrong Decisions
To tackle the issues surrounding family court decisions, some strategic measures can be implemented to reduce the risk of judgment errors.
1. Enhanced Training for Judges
Providing ongoing training focused on family dynamics, child psychology, and conflict resolution can improve judges’ decision-making capabilities.
This knowledge will help them better understand complex family relationships, leading to improved outcomes for families.
2. Improved CAFCASS Assessments
Improving the quality of CAFCASS assessments is crucial.
Implementing standardised procedures can ensure that all relevant information is taken into account.
Regular training for CAFCASS officers will also help them identify and mitigate their biases, resulting in more accurate assessments.
3. Encouraging Mediation
Promoting mediation before engaging in court can lead to more family-friendly resolutions.
Mediation encourages parents to work together to find mutually acceptable solutions, ultimately benefiting children and reducing unnecessary legal conflict.
4. Increased Transparency
Boosting transparency in family court proceedings can foster trust in the judicial system.
Providing clear and accessible explanations for judges’ decisions helps all parties understand the reasoning behind rulings, even if they disagree.
5. Utilising Technology
Using technology to streamline information management can significantly assist judges.
For instance, digital platforms and AI could help compile evidence and assessments efficiently, allowing judges to access relevant data quickly and comprehensively review cases.
Moving Forward
Family court judges have a critical role in shaping the lives of families and children.
While valid concerns exist about the quality of their decisions, recognising the complex nature of the family court system is essential.
Factors such as emotional bias, incomplete information, and the expectations placed on agencies like CAFCASS can all lead to judgment errors.
By adopting strategies to enhance training, improve assessments, encourage mediation, increase transparency, and leverage technology, we can work toward minimising errors in family court decisions.
Ultimately, the focus should be on prioritising children's best interests, fostering healthier family dynamics, and achieving better outcomes for everyone involved.
In exploring the role of family court judges and the influences on their decisions, we can create a more informed and proactive dialogue about the family court system, paving the way for meaningful improvements.
In need of help or support?
If you are an alienated parent reading this article and feel you are in need of help and support then please make sure to join PAPA today by signing up here on our website.
This will give you access to our community support forum as well as our Resource Centre, which includes downloadable guides and on-demand courses to help through the process of being alienated and regaining contact with your children.
We also have our Facebook support group that you can join here.
Our Facebook support group has several dedicated chat rooms where you can get immediate support.
If you are a member of PAPA you can also send us a message here on the website and we will try to get back to you as soon as possible but please bear in mind, we have hundreds of messages weekly so it may take us a while to get back to you.
We are currently prioritising PAPA Plus members due to high demand.
Regardless of circumstance you are not alone and at PAPA we are here to support you.
Become a PAPA Ambassador
If you like our resources, articles and support networks and agree with what we stand for then why not get involved and help us push PAPA further by joining our Ambassador Program?
We would love for you to join us and help spread awareness for parental alienation and all of the dynamics involved so that we can continue to help parents and children towards a better future.
Our Ambassador Program allows you to grow your involvement with the cause by earning points on your membership.
To earn points we have created rewards for actions such as completing one of our courses, booking a case review, or ordering supply.
We will be adding new rewards and actions to our Ambassador Program as we continue to grow our awareness efforts.
We want our members to feel rewarded for their support as we continue to look for new ways to improve the lives of those impacted by parental alienation.
You can also become a PAPA Plus member, which will give you exclusive access to even more help and resources.
Each PAPA Plus membership makes a huge difference to the cause as it really helps us to improve our services and our awareness campaigns.
Proceeds from memberships and supply allow us to push the cause much further towards raising awareness and improving our services and resources so that we can continue to help more and more parents and children.
Thank you for reading and for your continued support of PAPA and our mission to end parental alienation.
I have found with family court judges, that if your face doesn't fit, then they judge against you, also i have witnessed first hand, that if a family court case is listed for late in the afternoon, after 2.00 pm, then they cant be bothered to listen to your case, i presume they are in a rush to get home on time , yet if you get a morning case, they seem to take more time to listen. some of the judges i have met, do look down on you, like your a piece of dirt.