The 'Best Interests of the Child' Myth No One Wants to Question.

The phrase “best interests of the child” is often treated as an unquestionable moral shield in family courts.

It appears as a final word, a safeguard that no one dares challenge.

But what if repeating this phrase does not actually lead to decisions that truly focus on the child’s well-being?

What if it only makes those decisions unchallengeable, regardless of their real impact?

The uncomfortable truth is that children continue to lose loving parents under rulings made in the name of protecting them.

This article explores how this phrase, intended to protect, may sometimes obscure the reality of children’s needs and experiences.

If you're an alienated parent and need help with your situation then you should join PAPA today.

At PAPA we have several free to use support spaces, as well as several additional resources available to our Plus members, such as courses, PAPA AI, 1-2-1 help and workshops on family law and mental health.

Where the Phrase Came From and How It’s Used Today

The legal principle of the best interests of the child originated as a way to ensure that decisions about children prioritise their welfare above all else.

It was meant to be a clear guide for judges and professionals to focus on what would most benefit the child’s health, safety, and happiness.

Over time, however, the phrase has evolved into a catch-all justification.

It is often used to defend delays, inaction, or assumptions that go unchallenged.

Instead of providing clear standards, the phrase has become vague and flexible, allowing different interpretations that can work against the child’s actual needs.

There are no universally agreed, enforceable standards for what “best interests” means in practice.

This lack of clarity leaves room for decisions that may not reflect the child’s lived reality but are protected by the authority of the phrase itself.

When “Best Interests” Ignore the Child’s Lived Reality

Children’s voices are rarely heard directly in family court decisions.

Instead, their feelings and wishes are filtered through professionals such as social workers, psychologists, and lawyers.

These adults interpret or sometimes override what children express, often based on assumptions about what children should want or need.

Prolonged separation from a parent becomes normalised while courts wait for reports, hearings, and reviews.

This delay can stretch for months or even years.

Time is the one resource children cannot afford to lose, yet it is rarely treated as a safeguarding issue.

Every day spent apart from a loving parent can cause lasting emotional harm, but the system often fails to recognise this.

Parental Alienation: The Blind Spot

Parental alienation occurs when a child rejects one parent, often due to psychological pressure or manipulation by the other parent or external influences.

Unfortunately, this is frequently minimised or reframed as mere “conflict” between adults.

Courts and professionals may misread a child’s rejection of a parent as an independent choice, ignoring the subtle or overt pressures that shape that rejection.

Emotional harm caused by enforced absence is rarely measured or acknowledged, leaving a significant blind spot in family court decisions.

The Myth of Safety Through Delay

There is a common belief that doing nothing or delaying action is safer than making a quick decision.

This idea assumes that time will clarify the situation or protect the child from harm.

In reality, months and years of delay often deepen fear, loyalty conflicts, and false narratives in a child’s mind.

The longer a child is kept away from a parent, the harder it becomes to rebuild trust and connection.

Delay itself becomes the most damaging intervention, causing harm that could have been prevented by timely decisions.

Who Benefits From an Unquestioned Phrase

Institutions benefit when decisions based on the phrase best interests of the child cannot be clearly tested or challenged.

This protects courts, social services, and other agencies from accountability for outcomes.

The phrase shifts focus away from results and places it on intentions.

If a decision was made with the “best interests” in mind, it becomes difficult to question even if the child suffers.

This raises the question: who truly benefits when the phrase is used as a shield rather than a guide?

Moving Forward

The phrase best interests of the child carries weight and moral authority, but it should not be treated as an unquestionable truth.

When it becomes a barrier to honest discussion and timely action, children pay the price.

Recognising the limits of this phrase and demanding clearer standards, more direct listening to children, and faster decisions can help ensure that family courts truly serve the children they aim to protect.

In need of help or support?

If you are an alienated parent reading this article and feel you are in need of help and support then please make sure to join PAPA today by signing up here on our website.

This will give you access to our community support forum as well as our Resource Centre, which includes downloadable guides and on-demand courses to help through the process of being alienated and regaining contact with your children.

We also have our Facebook support group that you can join here.

Our Facebook support group has several dedicated chat rooms where you can get immediate support.

If you are a member of PAPA you can also send us a message here on the website and we will try to get back to you as soon as possible but please bear in mind, we have hundreds of messages weekly so it may take us a while to get back to you.

We are currently prioritising PAPA Plus members due to high demand.

Regardless of circumstance you are not alone and at PAPA we are here to support you.

Become a PAPA Ambassador

If you like our resources, articles and support networks and agree with what we stand for then why not get involved and help us push PAPA further by joining our Ambassador Program?

We would love for you to join us and help spread awareness for parental alienation and all of the dynamics involved so that we can continue to help parents and children towards a better future.

Our Ambassador Program allows you to grow your involvement with the cause by earning points on your membership.

To earn points we have created rewards for actions such as completing one of our courses, booking a case review, or ordering supply.

We will be adding new rewards and actions to our Ambassador Program as we continue to grow our awareness efforts.

We want our members to feel rewarded for their support as we continue to look for new ways to improve the lives of those impacted by parental alienation.

You can also become a PAPA Plus member, which will give you exclusive access to even more help and resources.

Each PAPA Plus membership makes a huge difference to the cause as it really helps us to improve our services and our awareness campaigns.

Proceeds from memberships and supply allow us to push the cause much further towards raising awareness and improving our services and resources so that we can continue to help more and more parents and children.

Thank you for reading and for your continued support of PAPA and our mission to end parental alienation.