When Should You Stop Defending the Other Parent to Your Child?
There is a point where “protecting the relationship” can quietly become something else: teaching a child to doubt what they saw, heard and felt.
Many separated parents are told, often rightly, to encourage their child’s relationship with the other parent. That advice exists for a reason. Children should not be pulled into adult conflict, asked to take sides, or used as messengers. They should be allowed to love both parents without guilt.
But that guidance becomes harder when a child grows older and starts noticing unhealthy behaviour for themselves.
They may say:
“Why do you always defend them when they upset me?”
That question can stop a parent in their tracks.
A younger child may need simple reassurance and calm explanations. An older child may need something different: honesty without hostility, validation without blame, and space to form their own understanding.
The aim is not to criticise the other parent. It is to stop pretending that hurtful behaviour is harmless when the child already knows it hurt.
This article is a compassionate guide to supporting your child’s relationship with their other parent without excusing harmful behaviour or invalidating what your child is experiencing.
If you're an alienated parent or family member and need help with your situation then you should join PAPA today.
At PAPA we have several free to use support spaces, as well as several additional resources available to our Plus members, such as courses, PAPA AI, 1-2-1 help and workshops on family law and mental health.
Encouraging a relationship does not mean excusing behaviour.
Supporting a child’s relationship with the other parent is different from defending everything that parent does.
A child can love a parent and still feel hurt by them. A parent can matter deeply to a child and still behave in ways that are confusing, harsh, manipulative, unreliable or unfair.
The difficulty is that many alienated parents become so used to being careful that they start explaining away everything.
A child says:
“They laughed at me when I was upset.”
The automatic reply becomes:
“They were probably joking.”
A child says:
“They ignored me all weekend.”
The reply becomes:
“Maybe they were just tired.”
A child says:
“They said it was my fault you were sad.”
The reply becomes:
“I’m sure they didn’t mean it like that.”
Each reply may come from a good place. The parent may be trying to reduce conflict. They may fear that agreeing with the child will look like criticism. They may be trying to avoid saying anything that could later be twisted or repeated.
But from the child’s point of view, it can feel like this:
“What I felt does not matter.”
“The adult’s feelings matter more than mine.”
“I cannot trust my own judgement.”
“Even the safe parent will minimise it.”
That is a heavy message, especially for a child who is already living with loyalty pressure.
A better response does not need to attack anyone. It can simply recognise the child’s experience.
Try:
“I can understand why that upset you.”
“You’re allowed to feel hurt by that.”
“That sounds like it was difficult.”
“I don’t know why they behaved that way.”
“You do not have to pretend it did not bother you.”
These responses do not tell the child what to think about the other parent. They do not diagnose, accuse or label. They simply say, your experience is real enough to be heard.
That matters.
Stop defending when the child is asking you to deny reality.
One sign that the old approach no longer helps is when your child begins challenging the excuses.
They may say:
“You always say they didn’t mean it.”
“You weren’t there.”
“Why do you take their side?”
“You tell me I should see them, but you don’t listen to what happens when I do.”
“If someone else treated me like that, you would say it was wrong.”
At that point, continuing to defend the behaviour can do real damage.
The child is no longer asking, “Can I still love this parent?” They are asking, “Can I trust myself?”
There is a key difference.
Children often test whether a parent can tolerate the truth. They may bring a small example first, then watch what happens. If the response is immediate defence of the other adult, the child may stop sharing. Not because the situation has improved, but because they have learnt that the conversation is unsafe.
This is especially risky with older children and teenagers. They are already developing stronger moral judgement. They notice contradictions. They remember what was said last time. They compare how adults respond in different settings.
If a teenager tells you, “They called me selfish because I wanted to spend time with my friends,” and you immediately say, “They probably felt rejected,” you may mean to create empathy.
The teenager may hear: “Their feelings justify how they spoke to me.”
A more balanced response would be:
“They may have had feelings about it, but calling you selfish would still have felt hurtful. You can care about their feelings without accepting unkind words.”
That kind of answer protects both things at once. It protects the child’s relationship with the parent, and it protects the child’s right to recognise poor behaviour.
Do not replace one narrative with another.
Stopping the defence does not mean moving into attack.
This is where many parents worry, and with good reason. They fear that if they validate the child’s pain, they will be accused of poisoning the child against the other parent. They may also have years of hurt of their own. When a child finally sees something clearly, the temptation to say, “I told you so,” can be strong.
Resist it.
The answer is not:
“Your mum is horrible.”
“Your dad has always been like that.”
“They are an alienator.”
“They have tried to turn you against me for years.”
“Now you finally see what I have been dealing with.”
Those statements may feel true to the rejected parent. They may even describe a real pattern. But to the child, they can create a new loyalty conflict.
One parent says, “Your other parent is the problem.”
The other parent says, “No, your other parent is the problem.”
The child is trapped between two adult narratives again.
In situations involving parental alienation, the safer path is to separate the person from the behaviour. You can name behaviour without naming the parent as bad.
For example:
Less helpful | More helpful |
“They are cruel.” | “That comment was unkind.” |
“They always manipulate you.” | “It is not fair for an adult to make you feel responsible for their feelings.” |
“They are trying to control you.” | “You are allowed to have your own thoughts and choices.” |
“They do not really care.” | “I cannot know what they feel, but I can understand why their behaviour hurt you.” |
This distinction is more than polite phrasing. It gives the child room to think.
They do not have to agree with a verdict about their parent. They can still hear that a behaviour was wrong. That helps them build judgement without feeling disloyal.
A useful internal rule is this:
Describe the behaviour. Do not define the parent.
That may sound simple, but it takes discipline. It means staying with the specific moment instead of turning it into a character assessment.
Try saying:
“I am not going to tell you what to think about your parent. I can say that being spoken to like that would upset many people.”
That is clear. It is also defensible, calm and child-centred.
Let older children develop their own understanding.
As children mature, they often begin to notice patterns adults once tried to manage for them.
They may realise that one parent rewrites events. They may notice that affection becomes conditional. They may see that private conversations later get repeated. They may recognise that one parent becomes angry whenever they enjoy time with the other.
These realisations can be painful. They can also arrive slowly.
A child might defend the difficult parent one week, then criticise them the next. They might feel angry, guilty, protective and confused in the same conversation. That does not mean they are manipulating you. It often means they are processing something complex.
Your role changes as this happens.
With younger children, parents often focus on reassurance:
“Both parents love you.”
“This is not your fault.”
“You do not need to worry about adult problems.”
Those messages still matter. But older children also need help trusting their perceptions.
That might sound like:
“You are allowed to notice patterns.”
“You do not have to decide everything today.”
“It is okay to have mixed feelings.”
“You can love someone and still feel hurt by them.”
“You do not have to protect me from what you feel.”
The last one is especially important.
Children in high-conflict separations often become careful emotional managers. They learn what each parent can cope with. They may hide affection for one parent to protect the other. They may hide hurt to avoid adding stress. They may present different versions of themselves in each home.
If your child begins opening up, do not rush them into your interpretation. Do not celebrate their criticism of the other parent. Do not interrogate them for details.
Be steady.
Say less than you want to say. Listen longer than feels comfortable. Ask gentle questions that help them reflect rather than perform.
For example:
“What was that like for you?”
“What did you need in that moment?”
“How do you feel about it now?”
“Would you like help thinking about what to do next, or do you just want me to listen?”
This kind of response tells the child they do not have to choose a side to be believed.
Protecting the child may require boundaries.
Validation is not the same as passivity.
Sometimes a child describes behaviour that needs a boundary. That might include persistent insults, pressure to reject the other parent, threats, frightening anger, emotional blackmail, unsafe supervision, or being drawn into adult disputes.
A calm response can still be firm.
You might say:
“I am sorry that happened. Adults should not ask children to carry messages like that. If it happens again, you can tell me, and we will think about the safest way to handle it.”
Or:
“You do not have to answer questions about my private life. You can say, ‘I don’t want to talk about that.’”
Or:
“If someone is shouting and you feel unsafe, I want you to move away if you can and contact a trusted adult.”
The boundary should fit the situation. It should not make the child responsible for managing adult behaviour. It should give them simple language and a felt sense that they are not alone.
Possible boundaries include:
Refusing to use the child as a messenger.
Keeping handovers calm and brief where possible.
Encouraging the child to speak to a counsellor, school pastoral lead, GP or another trusted adult if they need support.
Recording concerns factually for your own records if there are ongoing welfare issues.
Seeking legal or safeguarding advice if there are serious or repeated concerns.
This article is general information, not legal or clinical advice. If there are safety concerns, or if court orders are involved, get proper advice from a qualified professional in your area.
Boundaries work best when they are not framed as punishment. The child should not feel they have caused a new battle by speaking. Keep the focus on safety, emotional wellbeing and respectful communication.
What to say instead of defending.
The hardest part is often finding words in the moment.
A child may come home upset. They may be testing you. They may be angry that you “made” them go. They may repeat something cruel that was said about you. Your body may react before your judgement catches up.
Prepare a few calm phrases in advance.
Use words that do four things:
Acknowledge the feeling
Avoid attacking the other parent
Name the behaviour if needed
Leave space for the child’s own thinking
Here are some examples.
If the child says, “They said you don’t care about me.”
You might reply:
“That must have been painful to hear. I do care about you. I am sorry you were put in the middle of that.”
If the child says, “They got angry because I wanted to come here.”
You might reply:
“You should not have to manage an adult’s feelings about spending time with your other parent. I understand why that felt uncomfortable.”
If the child says, “They always make me feel guilty.”
You might reply:
“Feeling guilty can be really heavy. You are allowed to have relationships with both parents.”
If the child says, “Do you think they are a bad person?”
You might reply:
“I am not going to tell you what to think about them. I can listen to how their behaviour affects you.”
If the child says, “Why do you keep defending them?”
You might reply:
“You are right to ask that. I have been trying to avoid making things harder for you. I do not want to dismiss what you experience.”
That last response can be powerful because it repairs something. It admits that your protection may have landed badly. It shows your child that adults can reflect, apologise and change course.
The healthiest line is often the clearest one.
So when should you stop defending the other parent?
Stop when defending them means dismissing your child.
Stop when your explanations teach the child to override their own discomfort.
Stop when your child is no longer asking for reassurance, but asking whether their experience is allowed to be real.
Stop when the behaviour being described is harmful, repeated or emotionally unsafe.
You do not need to swing to the other extreme. Your child does not need you to declare the other parent terrible. They do not need a courtroom speech, a diagnosis, or a history lesson about everything you have endured.
They need a safe adult who can hold two truths at once:
A child may love a parent deeply.
That parent’s behaviour may still hurt them.
The most useful response is often calm and plain:
“I’m not going to tell you what to think about your parent. But I will always listen to how their behaviour makes you feel.”
That sentence protects the child from being recruited into conflict. It also protects them from being trained to accept what feels wrong.
And sometimes, that is the point where real safety begins.
In need of help or support?
If you are an alienated parent reading this article and feel you are in need of help and support then please make sure to join PAPA today by signing up here on our website.
This will give you access to our community support forum as well as our Resource Centre, which includes downloadable guides and on-demand courses to help through the process of being alienated and regaining contact with your children.
We also have our Facebook support group that you can join here.
Our Facebook support group has several dedicated chat rooms where you can get immediate support.
If you are a member of PAPA you can also send us a message here on the website and we will try to get back to you as soon as possible but please bear in mind, we have hundreds of messages weekly so it may take us a while to get back to you.
We are currently prioritising PAPA Plus members due to high demand.
Regardless of circumstance you are not alone and at PAPA we are here to support you.
Become a PAPA Ambassador
If you like our resources, articles and support networks and agree with what we stand for then why not get involved and help us push PAPA further by joining our Ambassador Program?
We would love for you to join us and help spread awareness for parental alienation and all of the dynamics involved so that we can continue to help parents and children towards a better future.
Our Ambassador Program allows you to grow your involvement with the cause by earning points on your membership.
To earn points we have created rewards for actions such as completing one of our courses, booking a case review, or ordering supply.
We will be adding new rewards and actions to our Ambassador Program as we continue to grow our awareness efforts.
We want our members to feel rewarded for their support as we continue to look for new ways to improve the lives of those impacted by parental alienation.
You can also become a PAPA Plus member, which will give you exclusive access to even more help and resources.
Each PAPA Plus membership makes a huge difference to the cause as it really helps us to improve our services and our awareness campaigns.
Proceeds from memberships and supply allow us to push the cause much further towards raising awareness and improving our services and resources so that we can continue to help more and more parents and children.
Thank you for reading and for your continued support of PAPA and our mission to end parental alienation.
header.all-comments