top of page

Is Secrecy in Family Courts Harming Those It Aims to Protect?

  • Writer: PAPA
    PAPA
  • 5 days ago
  • 6 min read

The family court system operates under strict secrecy rules designed to protect vulnerable children and families.


Person in a suit reads a book in a library, surrounded by shelves of black books. A gavel and scales are blurred in the foreground.

Hearings are closed to the public, reporting is limited, and parents often cannot discuss their own cases openly.


These measures were originally introduced to safeguard children’s identities and sensitive information.


Yet, in today’s world of digital transparency and growing demands for accountability, this secrecy raises serious questions.


Does it truly protect children, or does it shield the system itself from scrutiny?


This article explores the impact of secrecy in family courts, its consequences, and who really benefits from it.


If you are a parent currently going through family court, it is important that you join PAPA Plus and make use of our courses and other resources, including PAPA AI.


If you require direct assistance with your case, you can also book a call or one of our family law workshops with PAPA as a 'Plus' member. 


Why Secrecy Was Introduced in Family Courts


The family court system’s secrecy dates back decades.


Its main goals were:


  • Protecting children’s identities to prevent stigma or harm if their cases became public.

  • Avoiding sensationalist media coverage that could distort facts or invade privacy.

  • Safeguarding sensitive details such as medical records, allegations of abuse, or family trauma.


These intentions are understandable.


Family court cases often involve deeply personal and distressing issues.


Public exposure could cause further harm to children and families already in crisis.


How Secrecy Works in Practice


In family courts, hearings are held behind closed doors.


Journalists and the public cannot attend.


Reporting is heavily restricted, with strict rules on what can be published.


Parents are often legally barred from discussing their cases, even when they believe mistakes have been made.


Key professionals involved in cases include:


  • CAFCASS officers (Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service)

  • Social workers

  • Expert witnesses


These professionals prepare reports and give evidence, but their work is rarely open to public review.


Judges may publish rulings, but many do not, and appeals often happen without public knowledge.


This lack of openness means the system operates with limited external oversight.


The Consequences of Limited Transparency


Secrecy in family courts has several significant effects:


1. Reduced Accountability


Without public scrutiny, errors and poor conduct can go unnoticed.


For example, if a CAFCASS officer’s report contains mistakes or bias, there is little chance for challenge outside the court.


Judges and social workers face fewer consequences for delays or questionable decisions.


2. Parents and Children Are Silenced


Parents cannot share their experiences or raise concerns publicly.


This silence can be isolating and frustrating, especially when they feel the system has failed them.


Children’s voices are also often unheard beyond the courtroom.


3. Outdated or Questionable Evidence May Influence Decisions


Psychological theories or expert opinions used in cases may be outdated or controversial.


Without transparency, these influences remain hidden and unchallenged.


4. Systemic Problems Remain Invisible


Long delays, inefficiencies, and resource shortages in family courts are rarely exposed.


The public and policymakers may underestimate the scale of these issues because they happen behind closed doors.


Who Really Benefits from Secrecy?


Officially, secrecy exists to protect the child’s welfare.


In reality, the system itself often gains the most:


  • Judges avoid criticism by limiting published rulings.

  • CAFCASS workers and social services operate with little external review.

  • Local authorities can shield their practices from public scrutiny.

  • Expert witnesses face fewer challenges to their credibility.


Secrecy can also advantage the parent with more resources, such as money or legal support, who can navigate the system better while the other parent remains isolated.


Examples Illustrating the Impact of Secrecy


Consider a parent who believes a social worker’s report unfairly influenced a judge’s decision to limit contact with their child.


Due to court rules, the parent cannot publicly discuss the case or challenge the report outside the appeal process, which itself is confidential.


This leaves the parent feeling powerless and unheard.


In another case, a judge chooses not to publish a ruling that contains important legal reasoning.


Other families and lawyers cannot learn from this decision, limiting transparency and consistency in future cases.


Calls for Reform and Greater Transparency


Many experts, advocacy groups like PAPA, and affected families call for reforms to balance privacy with openness.


Suggestions include:


  • Publishing more court rulings with anonymised details.

  • Allowing parents to share their stories without breaching confidentiality.

  • Increasing oversight of professionals like CAFCASS officers.

  • Introducing clearer standards for evidence and expert testimony.


These changes aim to improve accountability while still protecting children’s identities.


If you want to help us make the family court system more transparent and accountable for their failings, then please take part in our Family Justice Transparency Report.


Our report is the largest independent data-set of family court data and we will be submitting this to parliament when it's completed, to show the urgent need for reform.


Add your voice to the data here.


Balancing Privacy and Accountability


Protecting children’s privacy remains crucial.


However, secrecy should not prevent families from seeking justice or the public from understanding how the system works.


Transparency can build trust, improve standards, and reduce errors.


Family courts must find a middle ground where sensitive information is safeguarded but the system remains open enough to allow scrutiny and learning.


The family court system’s secrecy was created with good intentions but now raises serious concerns.


It often protects the system more than the children it aims to serve.


Greater transparency and accountability are needed to ensure families receive fair treatment and the public can trust the process.


Without change, secrecy risks leaving vulnerable children and parents without a voice or recourse.


In need of help or support?


If you are an alienated parent reading this article and feel you are in need of help and support then please make sure to join PAPA today by signing up here on our website.


This will give you access to our community support forum as well as our Resource Centre, which includes downloadable guides and on-demand courses to help through the process of being alienated and regaining contact with your children.


We also have our Facebook support group that you can join here.


Our Facebook support group has several dedicated chat rooms where you can get immediate support.


If you are a member of PAPA you can also send us a message here on the website and we will try to get back to you as soon as possible but please bear in mind, we have hundreds of messages weekly so it may take us a while to get back to you.


We are currently prioritising PAPA Plus members due to high demand.


Regardless of circumstance you are not alone and at PAPA we are here to support you.


Become a PAPA Ambassador


If you like our resources, articles and support networks and agree with what we stand for then why not get involved and help us push PAPA further by joining our Ambassador Program?


We would love for you to join us and help spread awareness for parental alienation and all of the dynamics involved so that we can continue to help parents and children towards a better future.


Our Ambassador Program allows you to grow your involvement with the cause by earning points on your membership.


To earn points we have created rewards for actions such as completing one of our courses, booking a case review, or ordering supply.


We will be adding new rewards and actions to our Ambassador Program as we continue to grow our awareness efforts.


We want our members to feel rewarded for their support as we continue to look for new ways to improve the lives of those impacted by parental alienation.


You can also become a PAPA Plus member, which will give you exclusive access to even more help and resources.


Each PAPA Plus membership makes a huge difference to the cause as it really helps us to improve our services and our awareness campaigns.


Proceeds from memberships and supply allow us to push the cause much further towards raising awareness and improving our services and resources so that we can continue to help more and more parents and children.


Thank you for reading and for your continued support of PAPA and our mission to end parental alienation.

Comments


Let's Connect

Donate with PayPal

Donations are completely voluntary. Any amount will be used to maintain our support networks and to improve our services & campaigns.

Thanks for submitting!

Weekly Updates

Thanks for submitting!

© 2022 by People Against Parental Alienation. Created by Simon Cobb.

bottom of page